UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 25, 2010
LINWOOD EDWARD TRACY, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
STEVE COOLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: A. Howard Matz United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that defendant Cooley's Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs' claims for relief is granted with leave to amend; defendants McCoy and Edmon's Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs' claims for relief is granted with leave to amend; plaintiffs' claims against the remaining defendants are dismissed with leave to amend; plaintiffs' First Motion to Amend is denied; plaintiffs' Second Motion to Amend is denied; and if plaintiffs choose to amend, any valid claims will be stayed pursuant to the Younger doctrine.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.