Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Qinetiq Limited v. Oclaro Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


October 26, 2010

QINETIQ LIMITED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
OCLARO INC., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES' EXCHANGE OF PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS AND EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 4-2

Plaintiff QinetiQ Limited ("QinetiQ") and Defendant Oclaro Inc. ("Oclaro"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2010, this Court approved and entered a revised case management schedule (Dkt. No. 56) for the parties' compliance with the obligations and deadlines imposed in the Patent Local Rules ("Scheduling Order");

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order and Patent L.R. 4-1, the parties exchanged their proposed terms for claim construction on October 5, 2010;

WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order sets October 25, 2010 as the deadline for the parties to exchange their respective preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-2;

WHEREAS, Oclaro and QinetiQ have agreed to extend the October 25, 2010 deadline by one day to October 26, 2010;

WHEREAS, the proposed extension until October 26, 2010 is consistent with Patent L.R. 4-2(a), which provides for the exchange of preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence within 21 days after the exchange of the Patent L.R. 4-1 list of proposed terms;

WHEREAS, the proposed extension until October 26, 2010 will not alter the date of any event or any other deadline already fixed by Court order:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties shall have up to and including October 26, 2010 to exchange preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-2.

Dated: October 22, 2010

KAYE SCHOLER LLP Taryn Lam Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant QINETIQ LIMITED

COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP Orion Armon (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant OCLARO INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED:

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I, Taryn Lam, hereby attest in accordance with General Order No. 45.X(B) that Orion Armon, counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant Oclaro Inc., has provided his concurrence with the electronic filing of the foregoing document entitled STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES' EXCHANGE OF PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS AND EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 4-2.

Dated: October 22, 2010

Taryn Lam

20101026

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.