Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lewis v. Bradford

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


October 26, 2010

DARONTA T. LEWIS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BRADFORD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

On October 8, 2010, the court found that plaintiff's in forma pauperis application failed to include the certified copy of his trust account statement required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The court ordered plaintiff to submit the certified trust statement and warned him that failure to do so could result in dismissal.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not submitted the required trust account statement or otherwise responded to the court's order.*fn1

It therefore is ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.