IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
October 29, 2010
BRADLEY VAN DYKE, PLAINTIFF,
D.K. SISTO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Justin L. Quackenbush Senior United States District Judge
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME;
In a motion filed October 28, 2010, Plaintiff requests an additional 45-days to respond to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment due to limitations imposed by a prison mandate restricting prisoners' use of the law library. The court will allow Plaintiff the requested additional time until December 30, 2010 to respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is warned, however, that any request for additional time is unlikely to be granted as the extension herein granted is generous. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Ct. Rec. 52) is GRANTED.
The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and provide a copy to Plaintiff and counsel for the Defendants.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.