Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Adobe Systems Inc. v. Davachi

November 3, 2010

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
REZA DAVACHI, AN INDIVIDUAL AND D/B/A PROJECTCONTACTAFRICA; BAHAREH DAVACHI, AN INDIVIDUAL AND D/B/A PROJECTCONTACTAFRICA; GAYLE BARNES, AN INDIVIDUAL AND D/B/A WWW.DIRECTDEALS.COM; DIRECTDEALS, LLC; G.W.J. SOURCENET DISTRIBUTION, INC.; AND DOES 1 -- 10, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Samuel Conti

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Date: November 19, 2010

PLAINTIFF Adobe Systems Incorporated ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Reza Davachi, an individual and d/b/a ProjectContactAfrica; Bahareh Davachi, an individual and d/b/a ProjectContactAfrica; Gayle Barnes, an individual and d/b/a www.directdeals.com; DirectDeals, LLC; and W.J. Sourcenet Distribution, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed its complaint on or about August 13, 2010;

WHEREAS Plaintiff is to serve Defendants on or before December 11, 2010;

WHEREAS Defendants' counsel agreed to accept service for all Defendants;

WHEREAS Plaintiff mailed a waiver of service to Defendants on or about October 18, 2010;

WHEREAS Defendants have not yet returned the waiver of service and have until November 17, 2010, to do so;

WHEREAS, upon return of the waiver of service within the prescribed timeframe, Defendants shall have until December 17, 2010, to respond to the Complaint;

WHEREAS Defendants have not yet filed a response to the Complaint;

WHEREAS counsel for the Parties held a telephonic conference on October 29, 2010, to discuss the Court's Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines of August 13, 2010 ("Court's Order");

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's Order, the Parties are required to file the Stipulation to ADR Process on or about October 29, 2010;

WHEREAS, given the fact that none of the Defendants have filed yet filed an answer or otherwise appeared in this case, Defendants are unwilling to sign the Stipulation to ADR Process and consent to jurisdiction in the Northern District of California prematurely before they have assessed all defenses available to them, including whether exercise of jurisdiction over Defendants is proper in this District;

WHEREAS the Parties are attempting to resolve the claims alleged in the Complaint without further ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.