UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 4, 2010
CHARLENE A. BRITTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED PLAINTIFF,
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, MCNEIL PPC, INC., AND JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Thelton E. Henderson
Complaint Filed: Oct. 1, 2010
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned attorneys for Plaintiff Charlene Britton and the putative Class ("Plaintiff") and the undersigned attorneys for Defendants Johnson & Johnson, McNeil-PPC, Inc., and Johnson Consumer Products, Inc. ("Defendants") that:
1. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the time for Defendants to answer, move with respect to, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is hereby extended until and including December 2, 2010;
2. A stipulation between the parties to extend Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to December 2, 2010, will not alter any event or deadline already fixed by Court Order;
3. Execution of this stipulation is not a waiver of any claims or defenses
Plaintiff or Defendants may otherwise have, and all such claims and defenses are expressly reserved by Plaintiff and Defendants; and
4. Electronically reproduced or facsimile signatures on this stipulation shall have the same affect as original signatures.
Dated: November 1, 2010
Attorneys for Plaintiff Representative Plaintiff and the putative Plaintiff Classes ATTESTATION OF FILING PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I hereby attest that we have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from plaintiff's counsel identified in the signature block above.
Richard B. Goetz Attorneys for Defendants Johnson & Johnson, McNeil-PPC, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products, Inc.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.