The opinion of the court was delivered by: Margaret M. Morrow United States District Judge
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 08 16 10
X WITH COUNSEL Richard D. Goldman, DFPD
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:
Count 1s: Possession of Identification with Intent to Defraud the United States [18 U.S.C. §1028(a)(4)]. Class A
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $25, which is due immediately.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a total fine of $700, which shall bear interest as provided by law. The total sum
The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Christian Mauricio Sanchez Merlin, is hereby placed on probation on the single-count first superseding information for a term of two years under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
The defendant shall not commit any violation of local, state or federal law or ordinance;
The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of placement on probation and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month, as directed by the Probation Officer;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and the fine in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall participate for a period of one month in a home detention program which may include electronic monitoring, GPS, or voice recognition and shall observe all rules of such program, as directed by the Probation Officer. The defendant shall maintain a residential telephone line without devices and/or services that may interrupt operation of the monitoring equipment. Defendant is not required to commence the period of home detention until September 13, 2010. The court specifically recommends to the U.S. Probation that it allow the defendant to serve the period ...