Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gordon v. Better Business Bureau of the Southland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PRIORITY SEND CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 8, 2010

CHANCE E. GORDON
v.
THE BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU OF THE SOUTHLAND, ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable John F. Walter, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL

Shannon Reilly Courtroom Deputy

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On November 8, 2010, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's first claim for relief with prejudice for failure to file a "RICO Case Statement." In light of the Court's Order dismissing the only claim over which this Court has original jurisdiction, and after considering judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining claims for relief. See 28 U.S.C.§ 1367(c); Satey v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., 521 F.3d 1087, 1091 (9th Cir. 2008) (quoting Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 351 (1988) ("[I]n the usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors to be considered under the pendent jurisdiction doctrine -- judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity -- will point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state law

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101108

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.