Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. King

November 8, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
ERIC MATTHEW KING SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 3978 (LAST 4 DIGITS)



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Andrew J. Guilford U. S. District Judge

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 11 08 2010

X WITH COUNSEL John Feiner, Retd.

(Name of Counsel)

X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea. NOLO

CONTENDERE NOT

GUILTY

There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 USC §1343 as charged in the One Count Indictment The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100.00 which is due

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the amount of $246,500 under 18 USC §3663A as follows: Travis Jezwinski: $75,000; Ron Kite: $32,000; Toyna Figueroa: $21,500; Richard W. Laughlin: $55,000; Robert S. Laughin: $20,000; Gerald Elsbach: $20,000. And Karen Elisio: $23,000.

Nominal monthly payments of at least $25 per quarter shall be made during the period of supervised release. These payments shall begin 30 days after the commencement of supervision. Nominal restitution payments are ordered as the court finds that the defendant's economic circumstances do not allow for either immediate or future payment of the amount ordered. If the defendant makes a partial payment, each payee shall receive approximately proportional payment unless another priority order or percentage payment is specified in this

Under 18 USC §3612(f)(3)(A), interest on the restitution ordered is waived because the defendant does not have the ability to pay interest. Payments may be subject to penalties for default and delinquency under to 18 USC §3612(g). The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.

All fines are waived as it is found that the defendant does not have the ability to pay a fine in addition to

Under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Eric Matthew King, is hereby committed on Count 1 of the Indictment for a term of TIME SERVED.

Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of one year under the following terms and conditions:

The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the US Probation Office, and General Order 05-02;

The defendant shall not commit any violation of local, state or federal law or ordinance;

During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment; and

The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.

The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.