Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wilson v. State

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 8, 2010

CURTIS WILSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 24, 2010, the court issued an order setting this case for mediation on November 8, 2010, before Joe Ramsey, Esq. Plaintiff was ordered to personally attend the mediation and to provide a confidential settlement conference statement by October 29, 2010. Plaintiff failed to submit the confidential settlement conference statement, failed to appear for the mediation, and did not otherwise respond to the court's order.

The court possesses the discretionary authority to dismiss an action based on plaintiff's failure to diligently prosecute and for plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's orders. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this court's September 24, 2010 order and his failure to attend the scheduled mediation support the exercise of the court's discretion to dismiss this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

20101108

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.