Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dicey v. Pickens

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 17, 2010

BERLAN LYNELL DICEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
S. PICKENS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

In the pretrial order issued October 22, 2010, the court identified one of defendants' proposed exhibits as an Abstract of Judgment for plaintiff dated October 16, 1988. Defendants have objected, noting that the correct date on the proposed exhibit is October 16, 1998. The date correction is accepted; this acceptance does not constitute a ruling on the admissibility of the exhibit.

Plaintiff has asked for two blank subpoenas and/or writs of habeas corpus ad testificandum so he can subpoena Inmate Craver as a witness at trial. In a separate filing, the court has issued a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for Inmate Craver's presence at trial.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' objection to the pretrial order is sustained. Their proposed exhibit A is an Abstract of Judgment dated October 16, 1998.

2. Plaintiff's motion for blank subpoena/writ forms (docket no. 70) is denied.

20101117

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.