UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 18, 2010
DONALD D. WILLIS, PLAINTIFF,
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Dana M. Sabraw United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [Doc. 7.]
Plaintiff filed a Complaint for predatory lending and mortgage fraud, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") and a request for appointment of counsel. (Docs. 1-3.) On May 25, 2010, the Court issued an Order denying Plaintiff's motion to proceed IFP and request for appointment of counsel and dismissing the Complaint without prejudice. (Doc. 4.) The Court's Order granted Plaintiff 30 days leave to pay the $350.00 filing fee required to maintain the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914 or to submit additional documentation in support of his IFP motion. (Id.) On May 28, 2010, Plaintiff filed the instant amended IFP motion. (Doc. 7.) On June 1, 2010, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from the Court's May 25, 2010 Order. (Doc. 8.) The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an Order dismissing the appeal for failure to prosecute on October 12, 2010. (Doc. 13.)
Although Plaintiff's amended IFP motion states that he is currently unemployed and that he filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in December 2008, the Court finds that Plaintiff's declaration of inability to pay costs or give security is insufficient to permit him to proceed in forma pauperis. Specifically, Plaintiff states that he receives a pension payment of $2,700.00 a month from GM Corporation. (Doc. 7 at 2.) Plaintiff does not include any information in his amended motion as to his monthly expenses.
In light of this information, Plaintiff's amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Pursuant to this Order, however, Plaintiff is granted 30 days leave to pay the $350.00 filing fee required to maintain this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.