UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 19, 2010
NORMAN PIMENTEL, PLAINTIFF,
THE COUNTY OF FRESNO, AND DOES 1 TO 50, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO STRIKE AND ORDER THEREON
Date: November 22, 2010
It is hereby stipulated among the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and in the alternative to strike allegations of regulatory violations and attorney fees [FRCP 12(b) and (f)], presently set for hearing on November 22, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., in courtroom 3, shall be moved to Monday, January 24, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., in courtroom 3. This continuance is at the request of the plaintiff and his attorney, a sole practitioner, who requires additional time to respond to the motion. Plaintiff's response shall be due, in accordance with Local Rule 230, on or before January 10, and any reply shall be due on or before January 17, 2011.
DATED: November 18, 2010
JOEL M. MURILLO Attorney for Plaintiff NORMAN PIMENTEL
CAREY H. JOHNSON Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF FRESNO and CAPTAIN JOSE FLORES
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.