UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 19, 2010
CHAD ANTHONY GALVAN, PLAINTIFF,
S. PURVIANCE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lonny R. Suko Chief United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF
BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's Motion for Relief, Ct. Rec. 25, filed October 6, 2010. On August 3, 2010, a judgment was entered in this case (Ct. Rec. 21). On October 12, 2010, the Court entered an Order denying Plaintiff's motion for relief (Ct. Rec. 23), but inadvertently failed to dispose of a nearly identical motion for relief (Ct. Rec. 25) filed by plaintiff, which set forth the same argument about the alleged problems with jail mail. In light of the Court's disposition of this case,
IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff's motion for relief (Ct. Rec. 25) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, forward a copy to Plaintiff, and the file REMAINS CLOSED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.