Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ASHWINI KUMAR, MATTHEW MIXON, AND DULCE GONZALEZ CARRIE GOFRON, J. WILLIAM VANKE v. PICSEL TECHNOLOGIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


November 30, 2010

ASHWINI KUMAR, MATTHEW MIXON, AND DULCE GONZALEZ CARRIE GOFRON, J. WILLIAM VANKE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PICSEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
MASOOD JABBAR, IMRAN KHAND, ET AL. DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Claudia Wilken United States District Judge

[proposed] ORDER RE: AUTHORIZING SERVICEOF PROCESS ON DEFENDANT THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 1702(a) AND CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 416.10 (a)-(c)

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs' affidavit and support documentation, finds that Plaintiffs have established that process against Defendant Picsel Technologies, Inc. (PTI), cannot be served with reasonable diligence under California Code of Civil Procedure sections 416.10(a)-(c). Wherefore, the Court hereby authorizes service of process to be performed on PTI through the office of the California Secretary of State. Service in this matter is deemed complete on the 10th day after delivery of the process to the Secretary of State.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101130

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.