ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE
Plaintiffs Edna Miller and David McGuire, proceeding pro se, commenced this civil rights action on October 21, 2010, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. The action was initially assigned to District Judge Morrison C. England and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. By order filed November 29, 2010, this case was related to case No. 2:10-cv-1699 GEB DAD PS and reassigned to District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. All dates previously set in the above-captioned action have been vacated, and the case is now assigned to the undersigned for all purposes encompassed by Local Rule 302(c)(21).
Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set before the undersigned on Friday, March 11, 2011, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 27;
2. Within fourteen (14) days after plaintiffs are served with this order, plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this order upon each defendant. Within five (5) days after serving a copy of this order on a defendant, plaintiffs shall file with the court a certificate of service indicating the date and manner of service of this order on that defendant;
3. Any party may appear at the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128 at least 48 hours before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference;
4. Plaintiffs shall file and serve a status report on or before February 25, 2011, and defendants shall file and serve a status report or reports on or before March 4, 2011. Each status report shall address all of the following matters:
a. Progress of service of process;
b. Possible joinder of additional parties;
c. Possible amendment of the pleadings;
d. Jurisdiction and venue;
e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;
f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including disclosure of expert witnesses;
g. Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial conference and trial;
h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the relative simplicity ...