Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lawrence Blankenship v. California Department of Corrections and

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 1, 2010

LAWRENCE BLANKENSHIP,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER A. WILLIAMS, AND
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LITTLE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Lucy H. Koh

AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER CORRECTING DATE OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CHANGE TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION

Defendant A. Williams has requested a sixty-day extension of time, up to and including January 28, 2011, for all Defendants to file a dispositive motion. The Court finds good cause for the motion and grants it. Any opposition by Plaintiff to Defendant's dispositive motion shall be filed and served no later than thirty days from the date Defendant's motion is filed. Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than fifteen days after Plaintiff's opposition is filed.

20101201

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.