Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Marvin Glenn Hollis v. M.S. Downing

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 1, 2010

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
M.S. DOWNING, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to re-serve his oppositions on defendants and for the court to find his oppositions timely-filed under the mailbox rule. Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270-72, 275 (1988). Plaintiff's oppositions were timely filed and defendants have received plaintiff's oppositions via CM/ECF electronic filing. Therefore, plaintiff is not required to re-serve the oppositions on defendants. Defendants' motions now stand submitted and plaintiff shall file no further documents in connection with these pending motions.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's November 15, 2010 motion is partially granted.

2. Plaintiff's oppositions are deemed timely filed. Plaintiff is not required to reserve the oppositions.

3. Defendants' motions stand submitted. Plaintiff shall file no further documents in connection with these pending motions.

holl3431.eotd

20101201

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.