IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 3, 2010
MIKA CHRISTINA ALFARO, PLAINTIFF,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order filed October 4, 2010, the assigned district judge adopted the undersigned's findings and recommendations and denied plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dckt. No. 4. Plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Id. That order admonished plaintiff that failure to timely pay the filing fee would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id.
The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the required filing fee nor otherwise responded to the court's order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), based on plaintiff's failure to prosecute the action, and the Clerk be directed to close the case.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.