Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Robert Zieske v. Vision Financial Network; American Brokers

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 6, 2010

ROBERT ZIESKE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
VISION FINANCIAL NETWORK; AMERICAN BROKERS CONDUIT, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION; SHAHRAM YEKTARAD, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND MICHAEL AZAD, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff states in the Joint Status Report ("JSR") filed on November 29, 2010, "Defendant VISION FINANCIAL NETWORK has not appeared and Plaintiff has requested default against this defendant[; and,] Defendant YEKTARAD has been served and has not yet appeared." (ECF No. 34, 2:3-6.)

Plaintiff shall file a motion for entry of default judgment as to Defendants Vision Financial Network and Shahram Yektarad within thirty days of the date this Order is filed. If Plaintiff fails to timely file the motion, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing no later than 4:00 p.m. on January 24, 2010, why these defendants should not be dismissed for failure of prosecution.

Therefore, the status conference scheduled for December 13, 2010, is continued to commence at 9:00 a.m. on March 28, 2011. A Joint Status Report shall be filed fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference in which Plaintiff is required to explain the status of the default judgment.

Further, an order issued on July 16, 2010, which notified Plaintiff under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and 41(b) that if any defendant has not been served with process, the unserved defendant may be dismissed. (ECF No. 16, 6-8.) The July 16, 2010 Order further notified Plaintiff that "[i]f a certificate of service is not filed forthwith proving service, it will be assumed that no service has been made and a dismissal order could issue." Id. 2:8-10. Since no proof of service has been filed for Defendant American Brokers Conduit, Inc., that defendant is dismissed from this action without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101206

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.