Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rambus Inc v. Freescale Semiconductor

December 7, 2010

RAMBUS INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.'S
NVIDIA CORPORATION,
DEFENDANT.
NVIDIA CORPORATION,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
RAMBUS INC.,
DEFENDANT



The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Hon. Susan Illston United States Magistrate Judge

DEADLINE TO FILE A RESPONSE TO RAMBUS INC.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-12 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND

WHEREAS, on December 1, 2010, Plaintiff Rambus Inc. ("Rambus") filed Case No. 5:10-cv-05445-PSG against Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., ("Freescale") in this district. 24 WHEREAS, on December 3, 2010, Rambus filed an Administrative Motion To Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related Pursuant To Civil L.R. 3-12, (Dkt. No. 164), in which Rambus 26 brought Case No. 5:10-cv-05445-PSG and several other cases to this Court's attention.

WHEREAS, under Civil L.R. 3-12(e), any response to Rambus Inc.'s Administrative Motion To Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related Pursuant To Civil L.R. 3-12, (Dkt. No. 164), is currently due today, December 7, 2010.

WHEREAS, Freescale represents that it first learned of this motion late in the day on December 6, 2010.

THE PARTIES HEREBY SUBMIT THIS STIPULATED REQUEST THAT the Court extend Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.'s deadline to respond to Rambus Inc.'s Administrative Motion To Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related Pursuant To Civil L.R. 3-12 until Monday, December 13, 2010.

Respectfully submitted,

Jones Day

By:

Gregory L. Lippetz

State Bar No. 154228 JONES DAY Silicon Valley Office 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: 650-739-3939 Facsimile: 650-739-3900 Counsel for Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the above signatory attests that 12 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. 13 14

Dated: December 7, 2010

By:

PETER A. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.