Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

St. Jude Medical, Inc., A Minnesota Corporation v. Access Closure

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 9, 2010

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC., A MINNESOTA CORPORATION;
ST. JUDE MEDICAL PUERTO RICO, LLC, A PUERTO RICO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ACCESS CLOSURE, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Third Party Boston Scientific Corporation ("BSC") requests reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's November 22, 2010 Order, which granted Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel BSC to comply with their deposition and document subpoena, on the grounds that the Order "imposes significant burden on BSC, a non-party to the litigation; disregards the minimal value of the information sought; and violates the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45." (ECF No. 23, 2:2-3.)

Pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 303(f) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous" or "contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that BSC has not shown the Magistrate Judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, BSC's request for reconsideration is DENIED.

20101209

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.