IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 9, 2010
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY BENJAMIN BARAJAS,
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,
A CORPORATION, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANT(S).
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Plaintiff has determined that Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company did not own, operate, manage or maintain the subject premises nor own, operate or maintain the subject train involved in the subject accident. For that reason, Plaintiff agrees to dismiss Union Pacific Railroad Company from this action.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties acting through their respective counsel as undersigned, that Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, only, be dismissed with prejudice and that each party shall bear his own
costs and attorneys' fees.
DATED: December, 2010 DAVID ALLEN & ASSOCIATES EDUARDO GONZALEZ Attorneys for Plaintiff DATED: December , 2010 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY JOHN D. FEENEY
Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, as Successor-In-Interest to Southern Pacific Transportation Company DATED: December , 2010 FLESHER, BROOMAND LLP JACOB D. FLESHER, ESQ. Attorneys for BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
The Court having reviewed the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice Of Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and good cause appearing therefor,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY be dismissed with prejudice from the above-entitled action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.