Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Joseph Nathan Houston

December 10, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
JOSEPH NATHAN HOUSTON, JR.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: John F. Walter, U. S. District Judge

Joe Nathan Houston, Jr.

Social Security No. 8 8 2 7 (Last 4 digits)

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 12 06 2010

X WITH COUNSEL Joseph Nathan Houston, Jr., Pro Se

(Name of Counsel)

X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.

NOLO CONTENDERE

There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Offering Bribes to a Bank Official as to the Single-Count Indictment, in violation of 18 USC 215(a)(1).

The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:

Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for one year under the following terms and conditions:

The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;

The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month, as directed by the Probation Officer;

During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and fine in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;

The defendant shall not be employed by, affiliated with, own or control, or otherwise participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any financial institution insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; and

The defendant shall apply all monies received from income tax refunds, lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation.

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $25 , which is due

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a total fine of $4,000, which shall bear interest as A sum of $1,000 shall be paid immediately. Payment of the balance shall be due during the period of imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $25 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. If any amount of the fine remains unpaid after release from custody, monthly payments of $250 shall be ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.