Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Maureen Abston, Individually, and As Personal v. City of Merced

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 10, 2010

MAUREEN ABSTON, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD
ABSTON; COREY ABSTON; JACY ABSTON; LINDA ABSTON,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF MERCED, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; RUSS) THOMAS, IN HIS CAPACITY AS SHERIFF FOR THE CITY OF
MERCED; J. HART, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS
CAPACITY AS A POLICE OFFICER FOR CITY OF MERCED; B. DALIA, INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A , 2011 POLICE OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF MERCED;
P.M. N. ARELLANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND HER CAPACITY AS
POLICE OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF MERCED; S. KENSEY, INDIVIDUALLY; AND DOES 1-25, INCLUSIVE,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael J. Seng United States Magistrate Judge

DALE L. ALLEN, JR., # 145279 DIRK D. LARSEN, # 246028 LOW, BALL & LYNCH 505 Montgomery Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-2584 Telephone (415) 981-6630 Facsimile (415) 982-1634

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF MERCED; RUSS THOMAS; J. HART;

B. DALIA; N. ARELLANO dallen@lowball.com dlarsen@lowball.com

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER THEREON AND

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE RESET FOR

Date: March 24 Time: 1:30 Location: Courtroom 6

The parties to the above-captioned action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to continue the mandatory settlement conference currently scheduled for December 15, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., to March 10 or 24, 2011, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 6 of the above-entitled Court. The grounds for this stipulation are that Defendants intend to file a motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication, by the January 7, 2001 filing deadline, and the parties believe that the interests of economy and effectiveness would best be served if the mandatory settlement conference were to take place after the hearing of said motion.

SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the mandatory settlement conference currently scheduled for December 15, 2010, be continued to March 24, 2011, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 6 of the above-entitled Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 2010.

ci4d6 /s/

20101210

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.