Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Samuel anderson v. Matthew Tate

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 13, 2010

SAMUEL ANDERSON PLAINTIFF,
v.
MATTHEW TATE, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On November 5, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion (Doc. 12) to have his legal property returned. However, the court has not screened the complaint as plaintiff has yet to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, as plaintiff requested an extension to file the application, which was granted.

Plaintiff's motion for the return of his legal property is vacated, but plaintiff may bring the motion in the future should he file the in forma pauperis application and if the court find that plaintiff has cognizeable claims.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the return of his legal property (Doc. 12) is vacated.

20101213

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.