Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lehman Brothers Bank, Fsb v. Beverly Hills Estates Funding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 14, 2010

LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, FSB, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BEVERLY HILLS ESTATES FUNDING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge

#:3174

O

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF-ININTERVENTION'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Motion filed on November 15, 2010]

Presently before the court is Plaintiff-in-intervention RBC Mortgage Company of California's ("RBC") motion pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for leave to file the proposed Third Amended Complaint ("TAC"). Having considered the papers submitted by the parties, the court finds that Defendants California Title Company and William Thomas have neither alleged nor established any undue prejudice if RBC is granted leave to amend. Furthermore, RBC has set forth sufficient cause why it should be granted leave to file a TAC.

#:3175

For the foregoing reasons, the court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint and Join Parties as Plaintiffs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101214

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.