Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Danny James Cohea v. S. Adcock

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 15, 2010

DANNY JAMES COHEA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
S. ADCOCK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prison inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 29, 2009, this court granted plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is directed to show cause within twenty one days of the date of this order why his in forma pauperis status should not be revoked as the result of the "strikes" plaintiff suffered before the filing of this complaint: Cohea v. Kirshner, Civ. No. S-94-2105 GEB JFM P; Cohea v. Jones, Civ. No. F-95-5384 REC DLB P; and Cohea v. Bray, 97-366 FCD DAD P. See 28 U.S.C. §1915(g); Cohea v. California, 541 U.S. 970 (2004). Plaintiff's response to this order is limited to twenty pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2/cohe0998.3k

20101215

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.