Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Scott Holland v. Order Td Ameritrade

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 15, 2010

SCOTT HOLLAND, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TD AMERITRADE, INC., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the court is defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 15). In support of the motion to dismiss, defense counsel filed a declaration attaching various exhibits. This document violates Local Rule 140 in that the exhibits contain plaintiff's unredacted personal information. Rule 140 requires counsel to redact personal data identifiers from documents filed with the court. As the declaration fails to do so, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to strike that document, and it will not be referenced in connection with the pending motion to dismiss as filed. If counsel determines that the declaration and exhibits are required for the motion to dismiss, the motion and supporting documents may be re-filed and re-noticed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to strike the Declaration of Lois O. Rosenbaum (Doc. 17); and

2. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to restrict public access to the declaration.

20101215

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.