Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Malik Jones v. J.L. Bishop

December 16, 2010

MALIK JONES,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
J.L. BISHOP, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Justin L. Quackenbush Senior United States District Judge

ORDER RE: MOTIONS AND SUBSTITUTION OF SECRETARY OF CDCR

The following Order addresses several outstanding issues.

1. Defendant Stailey's Motion

The court's November 5, 2010 Order dismissed Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Stailey and considered Defendant Stailey a moving defendant. Ct. Rec. 62. The court herein supplements the November 5, 2010 Order to reflect that Defendant Stailey's Motion to Join in the Motion to Dismiss (Ct. Rec. 61) filed November 2, 2010 is GRANTED.

2. Substitution of Secretary of the CDCR, Matthew Cate

The court previously ordered Plaintiff to file a Notice of Substitution and the completed service forms for the Secretary of the CDCR on or before November 30, 2010. On November 16, 2010, Plaintiff advised the court that he intended to substitute Secretary of the CDCR Matthew Cate for the "Director of Corrections" but that he did not have the necessary service documents to supply. Ct. Rec. 64. The court and the parties shall construe this document (Ct. Rec. 64) as Plaintiff's Notice of Substitution of the Secretary of the CDCR, Matthew Cate, in lieu of Defendant "Director of Corrections."

The Clerk shall immediately send Plaintiff a USM-285 form for Defendant Cate to be served, as well as a summons, instruction sheet, and a copy of the First Amended Complaint (Ct. Rec. 15). Upon receipt, Plantiff shall submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the Court:

a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;

b. A completed summons for Defendant Cate;

c. A completed USM-285 form for Defendant Cate;

d. A copy of this Order for Defendant Cate; and

e. 1 copy of the Amended Complaint (Ct. Rec. 15.

Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendant Cate and need not request waiver of service. After receiving the above-described documents, the court will issue a separate ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.