IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 21, 2010
JONATHAN ZIMMERMAN, PLAINTIFF,
R. RIVAS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
By an order filed October 12, 2010, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants Brown and Haviland. That sixty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants Brown and Haviland be dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.