Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Curtis Lee Ervin v. Vincent Cullen

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 22, 2010

CURTIS LEE ERVIN,
PETITIONER,
v.
VINCENT CULLEN, ACTING WARDEN OF SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Claudia Wilken United States District Judge

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY, AND AMENDING SCHEDULING

ORDER

Death Penalty Case Pursuant to Petitioner's unopposed motion, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to complete discovery is extended until April 1, 2011. The Court's scheduling order of August 6, 2010, is further amended as follows:

1. Respondent shall move for summary judgment on or before July 1, 2011.

2. Petitioner shall oppose Respondent's motion within 90 days. In the same brief, Petitioner may also cross-move for summary judgment, and/or move for an evidentiary hearing.

3. In a single brief, Respondent shall reply to Petitioner's opposition and oppose Petitioner's motions, if any, within 45 days.

4. Petitioner shall reply to Respondent's opposition to any cross-motions within 30 days.

5. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court will take the motions under submission upon receipt of Petitioner's reply or expiration of the time for Petitioner to reply.

20101222

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.