Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Static Random Access Memory (Sram) Antitrust Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


December 23, 2010

IN RE STATIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (SRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership 2 Including Professional Corporations GARY L. HALLING, Cal. Bar No. 66087 3 JAMES L. McGINNIS, Cal. Bar No. 95788 MICHAEL W. SCARBOROUGH, Cal. Bar No. 203524 4 MONA SOLOUKI, Cal. Bar No. 215145 Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4109 Telephone: 415-434-9100 Facsimile: 415-434-3947 E-mail:ghalling@sheppardmullin.com 7 jmcginnis@sheppardmullin.com mscarborough@sheppardmullin.com msolouki@sheppardmullin.com Attorneys for Defendants SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD.,

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL SUBMISSION OF TRIAL EXHIBITS,

This Document Relates to:

ALL ACTIONS PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

Date: TBD

Time: TBD

Courtroom: 2

WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Stipulation And Order Regarding Pretrial Submission Of TrialExhibits, Pretrial Conference Statement And Pretrial Conference, signed by 3 the Court on November 24, 2010 [Dkt. # 1159], fourteen days prior to a further pretrial conference 4 set for 2:00 p.m. on January 18, 2011, or such other date and time as the Court may set, the parties 5 are required to submit, among other things, the following items required by the Court's Standing 6 7 exhibits (Order ¶3(b)); and designations of depositions and responses to discovery responses, and 9 objections thereto (Order ¶3(d)).

11 which has resulted in the elimination of several hundred exhibits, and are continuing their attempts 12 to reduce the overall lists to be submitted to the Court, along with their objections; 13

14 15 to discovery responses, and objections thereto, the Order did not contemplate the exchange of 16 counter designations and objections thereto, and the parties are presently coordinating the logistics 17 concerning color-coding their respective designations and objections, as well as their counter 18 designations and objections thereto, in order to present complete color-coded transcripts to the 19 Court -- per the Court's request at the December 14, 2010 Pretrial Conference; 20

21 22 parties identified below, and subject to the Court's approval, that paragraph 3 of the Stipulation And Order Regarding Pretrial Submission Of TrialExhibits, Pretrial Conference Statement And 24

1. Seven days prior to the pretrial conference set for 2:00 p.m. on January 18, 2011 (i.e., on January 11, 2011), the parties shall submit the following items required by the Order: 27 28

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL SUBMISSIONS

Order for Pretrial Preparation Order (the "Order"): Exhibit List and Objections and premarked WHEREAS, the parties have been diligently working to reduce their lists of trial exhibits,

WHEREAS, in connection with the exchange of designations of depositions and responses

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by the undersigned counsel on behalf of the Pretrial Conference, signed by the Court on November 24, 2010, shall be modified as follows: 25

Exhibit List and Objections and premarked exhibits (Order ¶3(b)); designations of depositions and 2 responses to discovery responses, and objections thereto (Order ¶3(d)). 3

2. Except as provided for in paragraph 1, above, all other provisions of the Stipulation

And Order Regarding Pretrial Submission Of TrialExhibits, Pretrial Conference Statement And 5

Pretrial Conference, signed by the Court on November 24, 2010 shall remain intact, and there will 6 7 be a further Pretrial Conference on January 18, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.

Dated: Respectfully submitted,

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL SUBMISSIONS

2 the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto. 3

MICHAEL W. SCARBOROUGH

I, Michael W. Scarborough, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that

Michael W. Scarborough

IT IS SO ORDERED

The Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Judge Northern District of California.

20101223

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.