Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

William Rouser v. M. Nieto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 29, 2010

WILLIAM ROUSER
v.
M. NIETO, ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Present: The Honorable Jay C. Gandhi, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Date December 29, 2010

Beatriz Martinez None Appearing Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None Appearing None Appearing Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

Pursuant to the Court's September 22, 2010 and November 4, 2010 Orders, Plaintiff was granted leave to file a Third Amended Complaint up and until December 6, 2010. (See Sep. 22, 2010 Ord. at 11-13; Nov. 4, 2010 Ord. at 1.) As of today's date, Plaintiff has yet to file a Third Amended Complaint.

Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action, or portions thereof, should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. If Plaintiff files his Third Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, he need not separately respond to this Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to timely file a response will be deemed by the Court as consent to the dismissal of this action, or portions thereof, without prejudice.

cc: Parties of Record Initials of Preparer

20101229

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.