UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
December 29, 2010
RAFAEL PACHECO, PLAINTIFF,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dolly M. Gee United States District Judge
ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint and all other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation.*fn1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that an Order be entered (1) approving and adopting the Report and Recommendation; (2) granting Defendant County of Riverside's Motion for Summary Judgment; and (3) directing that Judgment be entered dismissing the Third Amended Complaint, and the entire action, with prejudice.