Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Teresa J. Moore; Gertrude V. Vizmanos v. Bank of America; Recontrust Company; Us Bank National Association

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 29, 2010

TERESA J. MOORE; GERTRUDE V. VIZMANOS, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA; RECONTRUST COMPANY; US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; HARBORVIEW 2006-1 TRUST; AMIR ENTERPRISES LLC; MELVIN STRONG; JUDY SCHILLING; HADI R. SAYID-ALI; ED TURNER; AND DOES 1-100, DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

This case, in which plaintiffs are proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On September 13, 2010, plaintiffs Teresa Moore and Gertrude Vizmanos filed a complaint alleging, among other things, wrongful foreclosure, quiet title, and violations of various federal and state law statutes. Dckt. No. 1. On September 28, 2010, plaintiffs filed an ex parte motion for the approval of the recordation of the notice of pending action. Dckt. No. 4.

On November 12, 2010, defendant Judy Schilling filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff Moore's complaint.*fn1 Dckt. No. 8. That motion is noticed for hearing on January 12, 2011. Dckt. No. 11.

However, on December 16, 2010, plaintiff Teresa Moore filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 41(a)(1)(A)(1) stating that she was seeking to dismiss her claims against all defendants. Dckt. No. 15. Therefore, on December 22, 2010, the undersigned issued an order and findings and recommendations, (1) noting that upon the filing of her revised notice of voluntary dismissal, Moore's claims against all defendants except defendant Ed Turner were voluntarily dismissed; and (2) recommending that Moore's claims against defendant Turner be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) and that Moore be permitted to withdraw as a plaintiff in this action. Dckt. No. 16. Since defendant Schilling's motion only seeks to dismiss plaintiff's Moore's complaint, and that complaint has already been dismissed as to defendant Schilling, Schilling's motion is denied as moot.

Additionally, because plaintiffs' ex parte motion for the approval of the recordation of the notice of pending action, Dckt. No. 4, does not comply with Local Rule 230, that motion is denied without prejudice. If plaintiff Vizmanos seeks to re-file the motion, she shall do so in accordance with the Local Rules.

Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Schilling's motion to dismiss, Dckt. No. 8, is denied as moot, and the January 12, 2011 hearing thereon is vacated;

2. Plaintiffs' ex parte application motion for the approval of the recordation of the notice of pending action, Dckt. No. 4, is denied without prejudice;

3. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, defendants Bank of America, N.A., ReconTrust Company, N.A., and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for Harborview 2006-1 Trust Fund, shall re-notice their motion to dismiss, file a revised motion to dismiss, or file an answer to plaintiff Vizmanos's complaint;

4. The status (pretrial scheduling) conference currently set for January 19, 2011 is continued to April 13, 2011; and

5. On or before March 30, 2011, the parties shall file status reports, as required by the order issued on September 13, 2010, Dckt. No. 3.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 29, 2010


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.