IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 30, 2010
KENNETH ROBERT HUSKEY,
PAM AHLIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On December 9, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and contained noticed that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. On December 28, 2010, Plaintiff filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302, the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. ///// /////
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge filed December 9, 2010, are adopted in full;
2. Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claims against Defendants Kanaley, Wagoner, Rodgers, Ahlin, and King are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and
3. This action shall proceed on Plaintiff's state law claims and Fourteenth Amendment claims against Defendants Lasley and Pham.IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.