UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
January 3, 2011
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Jeffrey White United States District Court Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND EXPERT AND REBUTTAL EXPERTS
WHEREAS, the Court set November 29, 2010 as the deadline for expert disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) and December 10, 2010 as the deadline for 28 rebuttal expert disclosures; 30
WHEREAS, the Court set January 18, 2011 as the deadline for discovery cut off;
WHEREAS, the parties have been diligently engaging in discovery and are currently in the process of mediation/settlement discussions;
WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to extend the deadline for expert disclosures pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to December 30, 2010;
WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to extend the deadline for discovery to February 28, 2011;
WHEREAS, Defendant Starbucks Corporation served Plaintiff its expert disclosures on December 20, 2010;
WHEREAS, the parties believe that it would be beneficial to extend the rebuttal expert 10 disclosure and discovery cutoff deadlines while they continue to engage in mediation/settlement 11 discussions;
WHEREAS, the parties believe that good cause exists for a short extension of the discovery deadline and date on which rebuttal expert disclosures are to be made;
THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties, through their counsel of record, that the discovery cutoff deadline will be extended to February 28, 2011, and that rebuttal expert disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) will be made 16 no later than January 10, 2011.
December 27, 2010 The Law Office of Richard J. Meechan By: /s/ Richard J. Meechan Richard J. Meechan Attorney for Plaintiff SEAN GUNN DATED: December 27, 2010 Perkins Coie, LLP 25 By: /s/ Farschad Farzan Farschad Farzan Attorneys for Defendant Starbucks Corporation
WITH GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED.
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, Richard Meechan, attest that I obtained the concurrence of Farschad Farzan in filing this document.
I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 23rd day of December, 2010, at Santa Rosa, California.
/s/ Richard J. Meechan
Richard J. Meechan
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.