IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 3, 2011
VAUGHN EMERY WALTON, PLAINTIFF,
MICHEAL EVANS, WARDEN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
ORDER FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
By an order filed November 8, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to file a complete in forma pauperis application together with a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action to a United States District Judge; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.