Plaintiff, Robert Beard, an inmate confined at Kern Valley State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. Â§ 1983. His complaint concerns events alleged to have occurred while he was housed at High Desert State Prison. The case was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Â§ 636(b)(1).
I. Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Plaintiff requests leave to proceedin forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Â§ 1915. Dckt. No. 1. His application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. Â§ 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. Â§ 1915(b)(1) and (2).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Â§ 1915A, the court shall review "a complaint in a civil action in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity." 28 U.S.C. Â§ 1915A(a). "On review, the court shall identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint (1) is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (2) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief." Id. Â§ 1915A(b).
The court finds that, for the limited purposes of Â§ 1915A screening, the complaint states a cognizable claim for relief against defendant John Doe. However, as plaintiff has not provided the name of John Doe, the complaint cannot be served.
Accordingly, it hereby is ordered that:
1. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
2. Plaintiff shall pay the statutory filing fee of $350. All payments shall be collected in accordance with the notice to the Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed concurrently herewith.
3. Within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall provide the name and address of defendant John Doe to the court. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice to refiling should plaintiff later discover John Doe's identity.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...