UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 4, 2011
ROBERTO A. SOTELO,
T. BIRRING, ET AL., (DOC. 30, 32, 33)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Plaintiff Roberto A. Sotelo, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 10, 2008. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed February 24, 2009, against Defendants Birring, Das, Diep, and Coleman for acting with deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On November 1, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which recommended denial of Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff was provided thirty days within which to file an Objection, but none was filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 1, 2010, is adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, filed July 15, 2010, is DENIED, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.