Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Michael Pettenger

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 7, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL PETTENGER,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Date: February 7, 2011

AMENDED STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING;

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto and through their respective attorneys, that the status conference hearing in the above-captioned matter now scheduled for January 10, 2011 may be continued to February 7, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

This continuance is requested by counsel for the defendant to allow additional time for further defense preparation and to allow the parties additional time for plea negotiation prior to hearing. Assistant United States Attorney David L. Gappa has no objection to this request. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court.

The parties agree that time shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) in that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant such a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DATED: January 5, 2011 DAVID L. GAPPA Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender DATED: January 5, 2011 MELODY M. WALCOTT Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant MICHAEL PETTENGER

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B). For the reasons stated above, the court finds that the ends of justice served by the delay outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

0m8i78

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20110107

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.