Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mike Yellen v. Ana M. Olivarez

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 7, 2011

MIKE YELLEN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANA M. OLIVAREZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that his rights under the Eighth Amendment were violated during his incarceration at Deuel Vocational Institution (DVI) through exposure to contaminated water that was both unsafe to drink and unsanitary for bathing, cooking and maintaining oral hygiene. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that the water at DVI was unfit for human consumption, that the DVI plumbing is archaic, that DVI employees had been instructed not to drink the water, and that the faucet water in his cell looked like mud and had a putrid odor. Plaintiff claims that the water caused him to vomit, and that he is subject to future health risks due to his exposure to the contaminated water. Plaintiff seeks both money damages and injunctive relief.*fn1

The record reflects that plaintiff was paroled from the state prison system in 2004, see Order filed April 11, 2005, and there is no suggestion in the record that plaintiff has been reincarcerated. Plaintiff's last filing in this action was in January 2007. As noted in the court's December 20, 2010 findings and recommendations, there is a defense motion for summary judgment still pending before . Good cause appearing, plaintiff will be directed to inform the court in writing within ten days whether he intends to prosecute this action further. Failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within ten days from the date of this order plaintiff shall inform the court in writing whether he intends to prosecute this action further. Failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.