Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

San Francisco Technology Inc. v. Pfizer

January 11, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY INC.
PLAINTIFF(S),
v.
PFIZER, INC.
DEFENDANT(S).



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION 6 FORM

Pending before the Court are Defendant's pro hac vice applications. Upon review of the 10 record in this action, the Court notes that Defendant has not filed a written consent to Magistrate 11 Judge James' jurisdiction. This civil case was randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge James for all 12 purposes including trial. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district For the Northern District of California

COURT

COURT OURT 13 court are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of C C C

ISTRICT ISTRICT ISTRICT

D

D 16 same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.

final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by Magistrate 15 Judge James may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the

D

TATES

TATES TATES 17 You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and S S

S

NITED NITED ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.