Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. W. Scott Harkonen

January 12, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
W. SCOTT HARKONEN, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel United States District Court Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]ORDER SETTING BRIEFINGSCHEDULE AND HEARING ON BRADY MOTION; EXTENDING BRIEFING ON SUPPLEMENTAL SENTENCING BRIEFS; AND RESETTING SENTENCING HEARING STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]ORDER

Violation, and for Production of Additional Brady Evidence ("Brady Motion"), related to a recent 5 production of government documents by the United States;

fully to Dr. Harkonen's assertions in the Brady Motion, the United States has requested an extended 8 briefing schedule on the Brady Motion;

before the sentencing hearing;

Harkonen to file his supplemental sentencing brief regarding loss, and continued the sentencing 13 hearing to Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 2:30 p.m.;

respond to the Brady Motion, the parties have agreed that the sentencing hearing should be continued for a period of four weeks;

on Fraud Loss, filed with the Court on December 15, 2010, the United States relies upon the WHEREAS, in order to evaluate the statements made in that declaration, Dr. Harkonen has requested from the United States the medical records of L.K.M., and the United States has agreed to provide those records;

time to collect and produce L.K.M.'s medical records and may not be able to produce those records significant in advance of January 20, 2011, when Dr. Harkonen's supplemental sentencing brief regarding loss is due;

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, following several meet-and-confers between Defendant W. Scott Harkonen and the United States, Dr. Harkonen has filed a Motion for New Trial Due to Brady

WHEREAS, because of previous trial obligations in another matter and to respond

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that the Court should hear the Brady Motion

WHEREAS, the Court previously set Thursday, January 20, 2011 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.