Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Allabach et al v. Smithkline Beeham Corporation et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 12, 2011

ALLABACH ET AL
v.
SMITHKLINE BEEHAM CORPORATION ET AL

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Marilyn H. Patel

RELATED CASE ORDER

A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination.

I find that this and the below listed cases are not related to the case assigned to me. EMC

C 10-05726 EDL

Sorensen et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al

I find that the above and the below listed cases are not related to the case assigned to me. EMC

C 10-05727 EMC

Lade et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al

I find that the above and the below listed cases are not related to the case assigned to me. EMC

C 10-05728 EDL

Hunt et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al

I find that the above and the below listed cases are not related to the case assigned to me. EMC

C 10-05729 DMR

Florer-v-Glaxosmithkline LLC

I find that the above cases are not related to the case assigned to me. EMC

ORDER

Counsel are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re-noticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge.

Dated:

Dated:

Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen

Dated:

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Dated:

Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen

Dated:

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

CLERK'S NOTICE

The court has reviewed the motion and determined that no cases are related to C10-5724 EMC and C10-5727 EMC and no reassignments shall occur.

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk Deputy Clerk

By:

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on the date stated below, I lodged a copy of this order with each judicial officer and I mailed a copy to each counsel of record or pro se party in the cases listed above.

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

DATED: 1/12/11

By:

Deputy Clerk

Copies to: Courtroom Deputies

Case Systems Administrators Counsel of Record Entered into Assignment Program: (date)

20110112

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.