Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Microchip Technology, Inc., et al v. United Module Corp.

January 13, 2011

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC., ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
UNITED MODULE CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUF. CO. LTD., ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
UNITED MODULE CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
UNITED MODULE CORP., ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

For the Northern District of California United States District Court

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN RELATED CASES

In each of these related cases, Defendants have filed motions to dismiss, or in the alternative, to stay or transfer to the Eastern District of Texas. Those motions are set for hearing on March 3, 2011. The Court finds a briefing schedule appropriate. Accordingly, Oppositions are due 4 by Friday, February 4, 2011, and Replies are due by Friday, February 11, 2011. To the extent practicable, Plaintiffs and Defendants in each of the cases should coordinate in order to avoid repetitive briefing before the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110113

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.