IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 13, 2011
DARRYL A. SCHLAPPI, PETITIONER,
S.M. SALINAS, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge
Petitioner is a former state prisoner who, while still incarcerated, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the Board of Parole Hearings' decision to deny him parole in 2008. On September 23, 2010, respondent filed a motion to dismiss, to which petitioner has filed no opposition or otherwise responded. Respondent has since noticed the court that petitioner was found suitable for parole in a 2010 hearing and was released on July 26, 2010. See Docket No. 12. Petitioner's failure to oppose the motion to dismiss and the fact of his release requires him to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. He will have fourteen days from the entry of this order to do so. / / / / / /
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner has fourteen days from the entry of this order in which to show cause why this action should not be dismissed.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.