Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Michael Isreal v. Charles D. Lee M.D.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 14, 2011

MICHAEL ISREAL,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CHARLES D. LEE M.D., ET AL. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Judge

ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION

The Motion to Extend the Deadline to File Dispositive Motion by DEFENDANTS Charles D. Lee, M.D. and Robin Rodriguez and all related pleadings were submitted to this Court. The Court, 19 having read and considered the motion and related papers in this matter, and all other matters presented 20 to the Court, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby GRANTS the motion. The Court, extends the 21 time for defendants to file a dispositive motion. 22

IT IS ORDERED that DEFENDANTS shall file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion no later than sixty (60) days from the date of this order. The motion shall be 24 supported by adequate factual documentation and, if applicable, shall conform in all respects to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. If defendants are of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by 26 dispositive motion, they shall so inform the Court prior to the date the motion is due. All papers filed 27 with the Court shall be promptly served on plaintiff. 28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court and served on defendants no later than sixty (60) days after the date on which defendants' motion is filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' reply brief shall be filed no later than 14 days 4 after the date plaintiff's opposition is filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply 6 brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

20110114

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.