Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Nuance Communications, Inc v. Ecopy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


January 14, 2011

NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
ECOPY, INC. ET AL, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge

RON E. SHULMAN, State Bar No. 178263 rshulman@wsgr.com JULIE M. HOLLOWAY, State Bar No. 196942 jholloway@wsgr.com S. MICHAEL SONG, State Bar No. 198656 msong@wsgr.com WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 M. CRAIG TYLER (Pro hac Vice) ctyler@wsgr.com WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 900 South Capital of Texas Highway Las Cimas IV, Fifth Floor Austin, TX 78746-5546 Telephone: (512) 338-5400 Facsimile: (512) 338-5499 Attorneys for Plaintiff NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

[Additional Counsel on Signature Page} 15

AND CONSOLIDATED CASE.

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

4230555_1.DOCX AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS (Case Nos.: C 08-04227 JSW; C 08-04942 JSW) Subject to Court's approval, the parties hereby stipulate to amend their selection of ADR 2 mediator and date (which was approved by Court Order dated July 2, 2009; Dkt No. 99) since 3 the originally selected mediator, Antonio Piazza, Esq., is not available in San Francisco at the 4 time ordered by the Court for the ADR mediation session. 5

The parties met and conferred and agreed to appoint a new mediator, George L. Graff, Esq. The parties agree to jointly participate in the following ADR process: 7 8 Private Process:

Private ADR process of mediation by mediator George L. Graff, Esq.

The parties agree to hold an ADR session after issuance of the Court's Markman decision, as soon thereafter as Mr. Graff's and the parties' schedules allow.

This Amended Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process supersedes the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process previously submitted by the parties on July 2, 2009.

The captioned matter cases are hereby referred to Private ADR. The ADR session is to be 4 held after issuance of the Court's Markman decision, as soon thereafter as Mr. Graff's and the 5 parties' schedules allow. 6

20110114

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.